AI credit infrastructure

Assess what legacy systems cannot see.

Conversations, documents and images become a structured, evidence-based credit file.

01

Inputs

  • Conversation
  • Documents
  • Images
  • Alternative data
02

Evidence validation

  • Declared vs. evidence contrast
  • Inconsistency detection
  • Evidence coverage
03

Financial intelligence

  • Revenue and costs
  • Margins
  • Payment capacity
  • Scenarios
04

Decision-ready file

  • Customer profile
  • Risk analysis
  • Excel model
  • Explained score
VerifiedPartially verifiedInconsistentNot evaluable

Built for credit institutions

BanksFintechsMicrofinanceCredit unionsEmbedded lendingB2B marketplacesLeasingImpact funds

The problem

The income is real. The evidence is missing.

days

traditional assessment per case

minutes

with Evident

100%

of indicators traced to evidence

The problem is rarely a lack of income. It is a lack of structured evidence.

Illustrative comparison, subject to implementation scope.

Applicant experience

A guided conversation, not a form.

E

Evident agent

Online

  • Tell me about your business.
  • I run a produce store in the neighbourhood, six years now.
  • How much did you sell last month?
  • Around $2,400,000.
  • Do you have a document that supports it?
  • bank_statement.pdf
  • Got it. Now send a photo of the store.
  • store_photo.jpg

WhatsApp · web chat · your own channels

Questions that adapt

The agent follows the answers, not a fixed script.

Evidence in context

Documents, receipts and photos shared inside the chat.

Confirmation before submit

The applicant reviews a summary of everything declared.

Evidence model

Every claim carries a status.

DataDeclaredEvidenceStatus
Sales$2.4M monthlyReceipts · bank statementsVerified
Time in business6 yearsMunicipal licence · tax recordsVerified
InventoryFully stocked storeStore photosPartial
EmployeesThree employeesStatement onlyNot evaluable
Existing debtNo current debtAuthorised external dataInconsistent
Status distribution in a typical caseIllustrative
  • Verified45%
  • Partial25%
  • Not evaluable20%
  • Inconsistent10%

Financial intelligence

From informal answers to structured indicators.

Estimated sales

$2.31M /mo

Operating costs

$1.72M /mo

Operating margin

25.5%

Free cash flow

$412K /mo

  • Payment capacity$206K/mo
  • Capacity under −25% stress$118K/mo
  • Recommended instalment$98K/mo

Illustrative figures

712
Evident scoreConfigurable per institution
Reconstructed monthly cash flow
Verified income Operating costs

Decision package

Everything a committee needs, generated automatically.

Customer profile

PDF · DOCX

Risk analysis

PDF · DOCX

Credit capacity

PDF · DOCX

Financial model

XLSX

Evidence summary

PDF

Inconsistency report

PDF

Architecture

One platform. Modular by design.

  • 01ChannelsWhatsApp · web chat · your own channels
  • 02Interview agentDynamic, adaptive credit interviews
  • 03Verification engineDocuments, images and consistency checks
  • 04Financial engineIncome, capacity, ratios and stress scenarios
  • 05Score & rulesConfigurable scoring and institutional policy
  • 06Decision packageReports, financial model and evidence file
  • 07APIs & integrationsCore banking · LOS · CRM · warehouse

Human in the loop

Automation where possible. Human control where it matters.

Automated decision

Simple cases resolved by institutional rules.

Manual review

Inconsistencies or critical indicators escalate to an analyst.

Credit committee

Complex cases arrive documented and ready to discuss.

Outcome distribution in a typical portfolioIllustrative — depends on each institution's rules
  • Automated decision55%
  • Manual review30%
  • Committee15%

Pilot

Start with a measurable pilot.

6–12 weeks, one product, one segment, 200–1,000 cases and metrics agreed upfront.

6–12

Pilot

200–1.000

KPI